Defence budgets balloon like parade floats, the real question: who’s actually trying to invade us? A cheeky deep dive into whether Australia’s military obsession is about national defence—or just an expensive way to make America feel less lonely.
et’s get one thing straight: Australia is not some juicy, strategic croissant waiting to be snatched off the global buffet. We’re more like the weirdly isolated potato salad at the end of the table—vast, sandy, suspiciously distant, and absolutely not worth the airfare unless you're here for wine or minerals.
So when military experts start sounding like we’re one cyber-attack away from Red Dawn: The Southern Edition, it’s worth pausing to ask: who exactly are we defending against? The latest hand-wringing comes courtesy of a historian warning we’re repeating 1941’s mistakes. Sure, that sounds dramatic and historically literate, but here’s the plot twist: 1941 Australia wasn’t in a globalised economy where your top trade partner is allegedly your top threat.
We now sell more iron ore, wine, beef, and wheat to China than we do small talk to our neighbours. Are we really buying submarines to scare the country that keeps our export numbers looking sexy? Let’s be real. China is not about to load up amphibious tanks and head for Broome. Invading Australia would be a logistical nightmare—thousands of kilometres of ocean, a harsh, sparsely populated interior, and the very real possibility of having to fight off angry magpies.
It’s not a war; it’s a three-season Survivor reboot. So why the panic? Enter: America. Our trusty “strategic partner,” who’s got a few more enemies, a lot more debt, and an unfortunate habit of needing backup when it picks fights it can’t finish. Cue the endless "defence readiness" reports, AUKUS deals, and multi-billion dollar hardware we’ll receive in...
the 2040s. By then, the conflict will probably be fought over AI memes and drone sushi deliveries, not submarines. If anything, this isn't about protecting Australia. It’s about propping up a vision of the world order where we’re still in the cool kids' club, nodding along while Washington insists the party's fine, and definitely not about to burn down.
But maybe it’s time we stopped being America’s sidekick and started asking what actually keeps us safe: diplomacy, trade, and the kind of strategic independence that doesn’t rely on Uncle Sam’s mood swings. Because here’s a radical thought: maybe the best defence isn’t a missile, but a mature foreign policy.
One that balances our security interests without acting like China’s going to parachute into Darwin every time Xi gets a cold. And one that remembers we don’t need to cosplay Cold War warriors when we could just... not? So the next time someone demands billions for bombs, ask them this: do we really need more weapons—or just better Wi-Fi and a functioning health system?
Food for thought. Also, bring snacks—we’re going to be out here in the middle of nowhere for a while.
Comments (0)
*We remove anything illegal, hateful, defamatory.
Login to leave a comment.